Talk Talk Talk

  Sometimes i ask my self what the heck am i doing when come to leadership . doing things for church can be a nightmare and ending up being the one voice to voice displeasure and as well disagreements falls on deaf ears. whereas the PCC is like a stamp of approval for whatever the Pastor's says . to me it no voice of disagreement  Why am i still involve in this ? that is where talk about this thing call faithfulness.  when you been ask to get quotes , do this and that , out of sudden, you get another quote by yourself and asking me to endorse it . I ask my self this question , why must i do it ? how come i wasn't consulted and even ask and go behind my back for it  For instance ,  1) ask me to get quote for the awning , got it and then go behind my back and get one , and when i question the price which was more 60% lower, asking me back the questions as well , but when the work is done , it shabby and looking like normal zinc plated steal with color that's all.. no insulati

I got a chance to listen to most of the debates and arguments and see the draft response that was given to us in the view of the situation. However, if you listen also to Rev Miles, it gives an echo of strength to Dean Andrew’s “short” sharing which is very insightful. This is also echoing that last day’s lunch I got a chance to sit and listen to his point of view. But not the less we all agree we are in a default state of impairment relationship with the Church of England (COE).  With all that is said I have 2 questions: 1. As well all know the Archbishop of Canterbury and the Anglican Consultative Council (ACC) serve as the primary instrument of the unity with the Anglican faith. If we do not recognize them, what is the new instrument that unite us? will it be a new order like GAFCON? Or do we have another like that? does that also means a change in Canon Law? 2. How do you keep a nuanced impairment with the COE? As per my humble knowledge, most matters esp. ecumenical matters, it do